How many victims stop cycling after bicycle theft? An overview.

A detailed literature overview on the impact of bicycle theft on cycling uptake.

12 May 2025 by

a.bike

Summary

Bicycle theft poses a substantial threat to the growth and sustainability of cycling as a mode of transport and recreation. This analysis, mainly drawing from academic literature and research in Europe and North America, examines the behavioral impact of theft on both victims and potential cyclists. Data indicates that a notable portion of victims cease cycling or reduce their frequency post-theft; for instance, in France, approximately 8% of victims stop cycling and 46% cycle less, while in Belgium, around 12% of victims abandon cycling. Fear of theft also acts as a significant deterrent, with estimates suggesting that about 40% of potential cyclists in France are discouraged from adopting this mode of transport due to such concerns. The consequences of bicycle theft are particularly acute for low-income households, who often lack the resources to replace stolen bicycles or invest in high-quality security, leading to higher rates of cycling cessation. Addressing bicycle theft through effective prevention and support for victims is crucial for fostering cycling-friendly environments and achieving sustainable mobility goals.

Evidence from Europe indicates that a substantial portion of theft victims alter their cycling habits: approximately 25% cease cycling entirely, and 66% cycle less frequently after their bicycle is stolen [Litelock 2023]. Beyond the direct victims, the fear of theft acts as a significant deterrent for potential cyclists. In Germany, for instance, 42% of individuals cite safety concerns, including theft, as a primary reason for not cycling [ADFC]. The repercussions are not evenly distributed; low-income households often bear a heavier burden. The financial strain of replacing a stolen bicycle, which may be uninsured, can lead to a greater reluctance to continue cycling or to start in the first place.

The Impact of Bicycle Theft on Cycling Uptake

Bicycle theft is a significant impediment to the adoption and continued practice of cycling. The loss of a bicycle can have profound financial, emotional, and behavioral consequences for victims, while the fear of theft deters individuals from ever choosing cycling as a mode of transport or leisure. This analysis desribes specific ways bicycle theft influences the cycling habits of victims and the decisions of potential cyclists.

Cessation of Cycling Post-Theft

A considerable number of individuals who have their bicycles stolen choose to give up cycling entirely. In France, a 2017 survey by insurance company Ethias, reported in Imagine Magazine, found that 8% of bicycle theft victims stop cycling in Belgium [Imagine Magazine, 2017]. This figure is echoed by other reports, such as one by 20 Minutes, which also highlighted this 8% cessation rate among French victims [20 Minutes, 2020].

The situation is comparable in Belgium, where data from the Forum for the Future's 2024 report indicated that approximately 12% of Belgian bicycle theft victims abandon cycling after an incident [Forum for the Future, 2024].

While comprehensive, directly comparable statistics for Canada (including Quebec) and Switzerland are scarce in the reviewed literature, some U.S.-focused preliminary data from a survey involving BikeIndex suggested a higher rate, with approximately 20% of victims stopping cycling altogether [BikeIndex.org]. This highlights that the decision to stop cycling post-theft is a significant, though regionally variable, outcome.

A Europe-wide survey conducted by Litelok found that 25% of bicycle theft victims stopped cycling entirely after their bike was stolen [Litelock 2023]. This cessation is often linked not just to the financial loss but also to the psychological impact of the crime, which can feel like a personal violation and a breach of security. The AlterLock survey on bike theft in Europe also corroborates that high victimization rates correlate with such significant behavioral changes [Alterlock].

Reduction in Cycling Frequency

Beyond complete abandonment, many victims significantly reduce how often they cycle. This reduction can impact daily active mobility and potentially reverse personal gains in physical health.

In France, a 2020 study highlighted by 20 Minutes revealed that 46% of cyclists who have had their bicycle stolen report cycling less frequently thereafter, primarily due to the fear of repeat victimization [20 Minutes, 2020]. This indicates that nearly half of French victims alter their cycling habits negatively.

Data from the U.S.-focused BikeIndex bike registry survey also showed a substantial impact, with 30% of victims decreasing their cycling frequency [BikeIndex.org].

The Litelok survey revealed that 66% of those affected by bicycle theft cycle less frequently thereafter [Litelok]. This decrease can stem from a heightened sense of vulnerability, a reluctance to invest in a new bicycle that might also be stolen, or a general erosion of confidence in the safety of cycling in their environment.

A 529 Garage study, widely cited including by The Best Bike Lock, found that 25% of US-American bike theft victims cycled less after the incident [Bike Theft Statistics in the US (2024), The Best Bike Lock].

A UCITS study reported that 30% of US victims cycle less frequently post-theft.

A academic paper by Cohen et al. with a detailed list of relevant literaturel group those who reduce cycling with those who stop, reporting that 45% of respondents fell into one of these categories [Cohen et al. 2024].

A 2025 comprehensive review also noted that 25-49% of victims cycle less [The Ultimate Guide to Bicycle Theft Statistics & Insurance, SimpleBikeInsurance].

Impact of theft on Potential Cyclists

The fear of bicycle theft extends beyond those who have personally experienced it, significantly influencing individuals considering taking up cycling.

In France, fear of theft is a major deterrent. Surveys indicate that roughly 40% of those who do not cycle cite fear of theft as a barrier to begin cycling [20 Minutes, 2020; FUB, 2023]. The Fédération française des Usagères et Usagers de la Bicyclette (FUB) also notes that fear of theft contributes to an annual renunciation of cycling by nearly 80,000 individuals in France, encompassing both existing cyclists reducing activity and potential cyclists being put off [FUB]. One source even highlights that the risk of theft is a major reason why people choose not to purchase a bicycle [Cyclassur].

The fear of becoming a victim of bicycle theft is a significant barrier for many potential cyclists. A 2023 study by the Germany cyclist's association ADFC found that 42% of surveyed non-cycling residents or occasional cyclists cited safety concerns as a major factor against cycling, a category that prominently includes the fear of bicycle theft alongside traffic risks [AFDC]. Similarly, Austria's mobility ministry BMK noted in its 2023 Radverkehr report that perceived insecurity, amplified by theft fears, discourages new cyclists, particularly in regions with higher reported incidents [BMK Österreich].

The research by Cohen et al. mentioned above also highlighted that concerns about theft risk substantially influence individuals’ decisions to adopt biking, particularly in urban centers [Cohen et al. 2024].

A UK-based article from Insight-Security.com discusses how high levels of bicycle theft are actively turning people away from cycling [ Insight-Security.com].

Bicycle Theft and Low-Income Households

The impact of bicycle theft is not uniform across all demographics. Lower-income households often face greater challenges in replacing a stolen bicycle due to financial constraints. For low-income individuals and families, a bicycle can be an essential and affordable mode of transportation. These households are often less able to absorb the cost of replacement or invest in high-quality, expensive anti-theft devices and insurance [Two Roule].

Consequently, victims from lower-income backgrounds may face higher rates of permanent cycling abandonment. For example, the Forum for the Future (2024) noted that in Belgium, among victims in the lowest income quartile, abandonment rates after theft exceed the national average of 12% [Forum for the Future, 2024]. The Ethias (2017) survey also indicated that financial constraints significantly contribute to the permanent cessation of cycling post-theft [Imagine Magazine, 2017]. This can lead to reduced mobility, increased transportation costs if alternative modes are more expensive, and a loss of independence.

A study by Agarwal et al. on equity impacts in the US noted an annual theft rate of 4.2% for active cyclists in low-income groups, with many reducing or stopping cycling due to the financial burden [ Agarwal et al.].

The Cohen et al. academic paper also specifically highlighted that fear of theft is a significant barrier for lower-income groups [Cohen et al. 2024].

Consequently, individuals from lower-income backgrounds may be more likely to stop cycling altogether after a theft. One report indicated that 35% of individuals earning less than $50,000 annually fail to replace stolen bicycles, compared to those in higher-income brackets. This perpetuates mobility gaps and can exacerbate existing transport inequalities.

Regional Perspectives and Data Landscape

The impact of bicycle theft on cycling behavior varies in its documentation across different regions. While France and Belgium have some specific data points, information from Canada and Switzerland is more limited regarding direct behavioral changes post-theft.

France

France sees a significant number of bicycle thefts annually, with estimates ranging from 400,000 to nearly 580,000 [Cyclassur, Recobike, Velhome]. As discussed, this translates to 8% of victims stopping cycling and 46% cycling less. Furthermore, the FUB indicates that about 80,000 cyclists give up cycling each year due to theft, and fear of theft deters roughly 40% of potential cyclists [FUB, 20 Minutes].

Belgium

Belgium also faces a considerable bicycle theft problem, with reports of over 100,000 bicycles stolen annually [RTBF]. Around 12% of victims stop using a bicycle after a theft [Forum for the Future, 2024]. Low-income households are noted to have even higher cessation rates.

United Kingdom

UK crime survey data showed that bicycle-owning households where the household reference person was a full-time student or younger adult (16-34) consistently experienced higher victimization rates. Similarly, households with incomes less than £10,000 were more likely to be victims than those with higher incomes [ONS, 2017].

Summary of Key Statistics on Behavioral Impact

The following table summarizes the preliminary quantitative findings regarding the impact of bicycle theft on cycling behavior based on the available data from the provided sources. It's important to note the regional specificity of these figures and the data gaps in certain areas. Please feel free to contact us with further insights.

Region/Context	Victims Who Stop Cycling Post-Theft (%)	Victims Who Cycle Less Post-Theft (%)	Potential Cyclists Deterred by Fear of Theft (%)
France	8% (Ethias, 2017; 20 Minutes, 2020), 11% (ADMA)	46% (20 Minutes, 2020), 23% (ADMA)	40% of non-cyclists (20 Minutes, 2020; FUB, 2023)
Belgium	~12% (Forum for the Future, 2024; Ethias, 2017)	Data not specifically quantified in sources	Significant deterrent, but specific percentage not quantified in sources
General (U.S.-focused data)	20% (BikeIndex.org)	~30% (BikeIndex.org)	"Significant deterrent," specific percentage not broadly quantified
Europe	25% (Litelok)	66% (Litelok)
US	7% - 45% (International Journal of Sustainable Transportation; 529 Garage Study; LegalJobs.io; UCITS)	25% - 30% (some studies combine with stopping, up to 49%) (529 Garage Study; UCITS; SimpleBikeInsurance)	n/a
Germany			42% of potential Cyclists Deterred by Safety Concerns (incl. theft) ADFC Study (2023)
Spain	Barcelona: 17% (J.Sax)	Barcelona: 11% (J.Sax)

The information on this page may not be complete. It is work in progress by the small team of a.bike. Please contact us with any comments or suggestions to you may have. Last update 13 May 2025.

a.bike assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the content or for any actions taken based on the information provided.

References

a.bike 12 May 2025